Latest News


World Nation Michigan Opinion Features Labor About Us

THIS ISSUE


Download as a PDF file
[Needs Acrobat Reader]

NEWS

World
Nation
Michigan

Labor

OPINION

Editorials
Ad-Ed
Letters
FEATURES
History
In-Depth
Reviews
Party Notes
 

BACK ISSUES

January 2004
November 2003
September 2003
July 2003
SR1 2003
May 2003

ABOUT US

Editorial Board
Mission Statement
Contact Us

xxx

The Michigan Socialist | News | Michigan News

'This was no glitch'
African Americans challenge Mich. Democratic Caucus results

By L. MEYERS
The Michigan Socialist

WHEN THE FIVE candidates for the Democratic presidential nomination emerged from the Feb. 7 Michigan caucuses, it was thought that it would be known as little more than a footnote.

However, a coalition of community and political organizations in Detroit have launched a lawsuit challenging the results, saying that the Michigan Democratic Party “trampled on the voting rights of African Americans.”

The lawsuit, brought by the Michigan Democratic Black Caucus, the Michigan Legislative Black Caucus, the Detroit Chapter of the NAACP and the Detroit City Council, contends that Black voters in Detroit, Flint and other Michigan cities were systematically disenfranchised and denied their right to vote.

“For Detroit, the only difference between Florida in 2000 and Michigan in 2004 is the spelling of the state names and the weather,” said the Rev. Horace Sheffield III, spokesperson for the coalition.

“African Americans were stripped bare of our right to vote by those who claim to be our friends.”

According to Sheffield, several caucus sites in Detroit were moved or closed on the day of the caucus.

In Benton Harbor, Flint, Saginaw and other cities, polling sites were listed incorrectly or moved at the last minute.

The result was that thousands of voters were forced to wander aimlessly throughout the day, either on foot, in their cars or by taxicab, trying desperately to find where they were supposed to vote.

“Too many have been beaten, jailed and killed for this most precious right to vote,” said Sheffield. “We will not roll over. This was no glitch.”

Meanwhile, the leading figures of the Michigan Democratic Party have already begun to line up to defend the caucus results and dismiss the demands of African-American voters.

“No voters were disenfranchised in the city of Detroit,” said Mark Brewer, Executive Chair of the MDP and the person responsible for organizing the caucus.

Melvin Butch Hollowell, Chair of the MDP, attempted to pass the buck: “The delegation selection process [i.e., the Feb. 7 caucus — LM] was the responsibility of Mark Brewer.”

Democratic Governor Jennifer Granholm attempted to spin the story: “The bottom line is we had the second highest turnout in history.”

Detroit Mayor Kwame Kilpatrick, on the other hand, was blunt in his reply. He was quoted in the Detroit News, calling the coalition’s challenge “overboard and crap.”

At least one of them is being honest about the MDP’s view.

THE 2000 ELECTION confirmed in striking and terrific detail the contention that Socialists have asserted for decades: even the most “liberal” section of the capitalist class, or its agents, cannot and will not defend basic democratic rights.

When democratic-minded people in Florida and across the country mobilized to counter the actions of the Republican Party aimed at shutting down the manual recount of votes, the Democrats moved to defend their partners in crime and stop, or minimize, the protests.

When Jesse Jackson sought to organize protests against the developing Republican coup, the Democratic National Committee united with the Republicans and the capitalists, forcing him to call off the events.

When members of the Congressional Black Caucus and Congressional Progressive Caucus challenged the validity of Florida’s Electoral Votes in January 2001, not one Democratic Senator — including then-vice presidential candidate Joe Lieberman, then-Senate president Al Gore, or the two current front-runners for the 2004 nomination, John Kerry and John Edwards — stood up to defend the democratic rights of African Americans.

Honestly, should we expect the Michigan Democrats to act any differently than their national leadership? The answer, of course, is no.

African American voters across Michigan are right to be angry and frustrated by the callous indifference shown by Michigan Democratic Party leaders.

But anger and frustration has only so much value. Unless broader lessons are drawn from this experience, it is likely the situation will not change fundamentally.

The Socialist Party of Michigan will be fielding candidates in the November 2004 election for local and statewide offices.

We will be challenging both major parties, standing up for the rights and interests of the most exploited and oppressed in this society — people of color, women, gays and lesbians, etc.

The cornerstone of our platform will be winning the battle for democratic rights and a really democratic society.

Concretely, that means we will be fighting for the rights of the people of Detroit and the rest of Michigan, starting with the right to vote.

We encourage all readers of the Michigan Socialist to get involved in this campaign.

You can help with circulating petitions to get the SPMI on the ballot; you can help by joining the Party and actively promoting a Socialist alternative to the un-Democrats.

Most importantly, do not let someone else “represent” you, especially if they do not appear to care about your rights.

Represent yourself! Join the Socialist Party and make it your own.

All articles are φ Copyleft 2003-2004, the Michigan Socialist
Articles may be reproduced, printed and distributed freely, as long as proper attribution is given.
Any questions or comments, write a
Letter to the Editor